Confusion for Simpson kids 'far from over' Experts say Sydney, Justin will
struggle in coming years
Richard Price; Jonathan T. Lovitt
02/12/1997
USA Today
FINAL
Page 03A
(Copyright 1997)
LOS ANGELES -- The adults all won something. O.J. Simpson won his freedom
at the criminal trial. The families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman
won moral victories at the civil trial. Both sides threw parties. Both sipped
champagne.
But if experts are right, for the two children caught in the middle of the notorious
murder case -- 11-year-old Sydney Simpson and her 8-year-old brother, Justin --
this indescribably bizarre chapter in their lives is far from ending.
``The impact is just starting. It's far from over,'' says child psychiatrist Jaye-Jo
Portanova, who adds, ``I'm sure it's all very confusing.''
As it would be for anyone. These children live with a father who owes them
$12.5 million in their mother's death.
That's what a civil jury ruled. But a criminal jury, which once toured the
Rockingham estate where the children live, said there wasn't enough evidence to
prove that he did it.
There are so many areas of confusion. The children are biracial, and they live in
a nation divided over their father. Most whites polled say he killed their mother.
Most blacks polled don't believe it.
They love their father. They love their maternal grandparents, Lou and Juditha
Brown. And both Simpson and the Browns adore the kids. Even in his darkest
hour in the civil case, Simpson would light up when he talked about them.
``I've been inside Rockingham. For all those people wondering about what goes
on inside, O.J. Simpson loves those children and most importantly Sydney and
Justin love him,'' said Leo Terrell, a lawyer and Simpson's friend.
The Browns, meanwhile, struggle with losing the children. Every time Juditha
buys gas, she says she thinks about how excited Justin used to get when he
pumped it for her.
So the Browns and Simpson feel the same way about the children but are bitter
enemies in every other regard. That could spread a lot of confusion, say the
experts.
Now their grandfather, Lou, is the executor of their mother's estate, which is
where Simpson will have to deposit the civil-suit damages. But analysts say their
father may be entitled to draw from those funds to help support them.
Another strange feature: Both children, until they're 18, theoretically could sue
Simpson for causing the wrongful death of their mother.
If they don't understand all that now, they will. They live at the center of the
most publicized murder case in history, and they'll be flooded with opinion and
information as they move through adolescence.
And there will be more battles. The Browns have 20 years to collect the financial
judgment; fights over Simpson's assets are inevitable.
Also, if Simpson appeals the verdict and wins a retrial, the kids could have to
deal with another big courtroom spectacle.
And the custody war isn't over. The Browns plan to appeal the judge's decision
that gave Simpson the children. They'll argue that Judge Nancy Wieben Stock
was wrong when she didn't admit evidence on whether Simpson killed Nicole. If
they win, Simpson could wind up defending himself a third time.
There are angry words, too. Although Simpson has been relatively quiet lately,
the Browns have been vocal. Nicole's sister, Denise, speaks out against Simpson
regularly.
The family thinks Simpson poisons the children's minds privately. They ``get
most of their information from their father, I'm afraid,'' Lou Brown said this
week. ``Very little has come from us. We tried to protect the children in every
way, shape and form.''
To some degree, the kids also are pawns in a heated policy debate over parental
rights. On Tuesday, state Rep. Barbara Alby announced she'll introduce a bill
next week meant to strip Simpson of custody.
The bill would deny custody to any parent found guilty in criminal court, or
liable in civil court, of causing the wrongful death of the other parent.
Gloria Allred, a Brown family friend and the family's former lawyer, persuaded
Alby to introduce the bill. Allred said the Browns pledged to testify on the bill's
behalf.
Analysts say the law is feasible, but it worries some.
``If this gets on the books, the judge will have to follow it,'' says family lawyer
Roslyn Soudry. ``But . . . this is trial by public consensus. The standard should
be what's best for the children, and only the people closely involved really know
what's going on.''
PHOTO,b/w,Fred Prouser,Reuters; PHOTO,b/w,Kevork Djansezian,AP